iSystems Automated Trading Platform

Learn more about automated futures trading with Cannon Trading Company here.

Managed accounts and algo trading have become integral components of the futures trading landscape. These approaches allow traders and investors to leverage the expertise of professional account managers and harness the power of algorithmic trading strategies. This article delves into the world of managed accounts and algo trading in the context of futures trading, discussing who manages these accounts, the past performance of account managers, risks associated with third-party management, the history of managed futures accounts, and the substantial sums of capital under management.

1. Who Manages Managed Futures Accounts?

Managed futures accounts are typically managed by professional traders, money managers, or commodity trading advisors (CTAs). These individuals or firms specialize in trading futures contracts on behalf of their clients. Managed futures programs can be offered by various entities, including hedge funds, proprietary trading firms, and registered CTAs.

• a. CTAs (Commodity Trading Advisors): CTAs are registered with regulatory bodies and provide trading advisory services to clients. They design and execute trading strategies in futures markets on behalf of investors. CTAs may employ discretionary, systematic, or algorithmic trading approaches.
• b. Hedge Funds: Hedge funds often have managed futures strategies as part of their overall investment portfolio. They deploy skilled traders and automated trading systems to manage futures positions.
• c. Proprietary Trading Firms: Proprietary trading firms engage in trading for their own account and may also manage managed futures accounts. They leverage their trading expertise and infrastructure to execute strategies on behalf of clients.

2. Past Performance of Account Managers

Evaluating the past performance of account managers is crucial for investors considering managed futures accounts. Performance data can provide valuable insights into the manager's skill, risk management, and ability to generate returns. However, it's important to remember that past performance is not indicative of future results, and there are several factors to consider when assessing a manager's track record:

• a. Historical Performance: Investors should review a manager's historical performance, including returns, risk-adjusted metrics, and drawdown statistics. Analyzing multiple years of performance data can help assess consistency.
• b. Risk Management: A manager's ability to control risk and limit drawdowns is critical. Review risk metrics, such as the Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, and the maximum drawdown experienced.
• c. Market Conditions: Examine how the manager's performance fared under various market conditions, including bull markets, bear markets, and periods of high volatility.
• d. Transparency: Transparent reporting of performance results, trading strategies, and risk management practices is essential. This transparency instills trust and confidence in the manager.
• e. Verification: In some cases, account managers may provide audited performance data, which can be independently verified for accuracy.

Example of Past Performance:

Suppose an investor is considering a managed futures account managed by a CTA. The CTA has a historical track record of achieving an average annual return of 12% over the past five years, with a maximum drawdown of 8%. This data suggests a history of consistent performance and an effective risk management approach. However, the investor should conduct due diligence and evaluate other aspects of the manager's strategy.

3. Risks of Third-Party Management

While managed futures accounts offer benefits, they are not without risks. Entrusting a third party to manage your capital carries inherent challenges that investors must be aware of:

• a. Manager Skill: The success of a managed account is highly dependent on the skills and expertise of the account manager. Poor decision-making or a lack of risk management can lead to losses.
• b. Fees: Managed accounts often involve management fees and, in some cases, performance fees. These costs can erode a significant portion of returns if the account does not perform well.
• c. Lack of Control: Investors have limited control over the trading decisions made in their managed accounts. They must rely on the manager's judgment and strategy execution.
• d. Market Risk: Futures trading is inherently risky, and there is a possibility of losing capital, regardless of the manager's skill.
• e. Counterparty Risk: Investors should consider the counterparty risk associated with the entity managing the account. It's essential to choose reputable and regulated managers.
• f. Lack of Liquidity: Some managed accounts may have lock-up periods or redemption restrictions, limiting an investor's ability to access their capital when needed.

Example of Risks:

Suppose an investor chooses a managed futures account with a performance fee structure. If the account manager fails to generate positive returns, the investor may still be required to pay the management fee, resulting in a net loss. Additionally, if the investor needs to liquidate the account during a market downturn, they may face redemption restrictions, limiting their ability to access their funds promptly.

4. Managed Futures Account History

Managed futures accounts have a rich history that dates back several decades. The concept of commodity trading advisors (CTAs) and managed futures programs began to gain prominence in the 1970s. This approach was initially aimed at providing investors exposure to commodities and commodity-related derivatives. Over the years, managed futures evolved and expanded to include various futures contracts, asset classes, and trading strategies.

Key milestones in the history of managed futures accounts include:

• a. Emergence of CTAs: The 1970s saw the rise of CTAs, who offered systematic trading strategies in commodity futures markets. This period marked the birth of managed futures programs.
• b. Growth in Managed Futures Assets: Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the assets under management in managed futures accounts grew significantly as investors sought portfolio diversification and alternative sources of returns.
• c. Regulatory Framework: Regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), introduced regulations to oversee CTAs and protect investor interests.
• d. Expansion of Strategies: Managed futures strategies expanded to include not only commodity futures but also financial futures, foreign exchange (Forex), and other derivatives. Diversification strategies became common.
• e. Increased Institutional Interest: Managed futures attracted institutional investors, including pension funds and endowments, seeking uncorrelated returns and risk management.
• f. Integration of Algo Trading: The integration of algorithmic trading (algo trading) and artificial intelligence (AI) further transformed managed futures. Advanced algorithms and AI-driven models became instrumental in executing trading strategies.

5. Total Assets Under Management

The total assets under management (AUM) in managed accounts, including managed futures accounts, have experienced significant growth over the years. While exact figures can fluctuate, the managed futures industry has seen substantial capital inflows from a diverse range of investors.

As of my knowledge cutoff date in January 2022, the AUM in managed futures accounts were estimated to be in the hundreds of billions of dollars. However, the precise figure may vary due to market fluctuations and changes in investor sentiment.

The growth in AUM can be attributed to various factors, including the desire for portfolio diversification, the pursuit of uncorrelated returns, and the adoption of alternative investment strategies. Additionally, the integration of algo trading and AI-driven approaches has contributed to the industry's evolution and attracted more assets.

Managed accounts and algo trading play a vital role in the world of futures trading, offering investors the opportunity to access professional management and advanced trading strategies. Account managers, including CTAs, hedge funds, and proprietary trading firms, oversee managed futures accounts, bringing their expertise to the table.

When considering managed futures accounts, evaluating the past performance of account managers is essential, but it's crucial to recognize that past results are not guarantees of future performance. Investors must also be aware of the risks associated with third-party management, including fees, lack of control, and market risk.

The history of managed futures accounts highlights their evolution from a focus on commodity trading to a broader range of asset classes and strategies. The industry has experienced substantial growth in assets under management, with investors seeking diversified portfolios and uncorrelated returns.

In the world of futures trading, managed accounts and algo trading offer avenues for both experienced and novice investors to explore innovative strategies and harness the potential of automated trading systems. Nevertheless, it is paramount for investors to conduct thorough due diligence and consider their risk tolerance when entering the managed futures space.

Ready to start trading futures? Call US 1(800)454-9572 - Int’l (310)859-9572 email info@cannontrading.com and speak to one of our experienced, Series-3 licensed futures brokers and start your futures trading journey with Cannon Trading Company today.

Disclaimer - Trading Futures, Options on Futures, and retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors.  Past performance is not indicative of future results. You should carefully consider whether trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances, knowledge, and financial resources. You may lose all or more of your initial investment. Opinions, market data, and recommendations are subject to change at any time.

**This article has been generated with the help of AI Technology. It has been modified from the original draft for accuracy and compliance reasons.